You cannot copy content from our website. If you need this sample, insert an email and we'll deliver it to you. One of the longest thriving gatherings in the world has been storytelling. Originally storytelling was just what it sounds like: telling a story.

Author:Zulkigis Nikorn
Language:English (Spanish)
Published (Last):5 December 2008
PDF File Size:13.4 Mb
ePub File Size:4.68 Mb
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

You cannot copy content from our website. If you need this sample, insert an email and we'll deliver it to you. One of the longest thriving gatherings in the world has been storytelling.

Originally storytelling was just what it sounds like: telling a story. Sitting with a group of people in a community and telling a fable about anything from a tortoise winning a race to a common servant girl going to the ball. The story itself has changed immensely from the days of oral story. When thinking of tales such as Snow White or Cinderella, we tend to immediately associate the stories with the Disney productions and animated characters, never acknowledging the writers and collectors that they originated from.

Walt Disney, according to Zipes, distorted and demented the original story and the original folk tales and turned them into his own personal stories. Zipes dives into the drastic change of the novel and how Walt Disney himself was the father of this change. Why does Zipes tear down Disney in his very first paragraph?

Surely Zipes must have known that his readers, assumingly, love Disney and his empire and yet Zipes continues to tell the history of the idea of the story and how the superpower destroyed the story and completely revamped it. In an ironic twist, Zipes spends about 2 paragraphs talking about the well-known story of how Disney grew up with his brother Roy and dealing with a loving but abusive father. This is where Zipes inserts what actually seems like normal human emotion but then continues on in his quest for the deconstruction of Disney.

His argument begins with the explanation of an oedipal complex, informing the reader that most of the plots of earlier movies were seeded at the deepest oedipal desires of young boys and men. Perrault puts his focus on the cat as the cunning hero of the story whereas Disney portrays the young man as the hero and the cat as a cunning sidekick. Using a movie media to closely comment on oedipal complexes, Disney also touches on democracy, technology, and modernity. Many animators identified with their movies and tried to add morals and underlying messages in their movies and shorts and stories.

But did Disney add any other message other than to show audiences that he endured something similar? Did he do anything other than depict himself as the hero who came in and saved humanity and open their eyes to the world of is movies?

Or did he simply put a spell on humanity to only see his movies and forget the origins of stories? The Brothers Grimm have always written what we now consider to be demented and cruel stories. The Brothers Grimm always wrote stories to teach lessons and to use issues that were current at the time.

The prince almost drowns and Sirenetta saves him and pushes him toward the beach where a woman finds him. When Sirenetta makes a deal with the sea witch, she goes to land with legs and feels torturous pain every step she takes and every movement she makes. In order to live, Sirenetta must marry the prince. The prince sees her when she faints on shore and then takes her back to the castle, but thinks of the woman he believes that saved his life.

As Sirenetta falls in love with the prince, the mysterious woman comes to the castle and the prince asks the woman to marry him. Sirenetta accepts her fate and gets her voice back when she dies. Knowing the Disney version, there are obvious and clear differences between the two versions. Could he have made it happier but not changed as much? The answer in accordance Jack Zipes: no.

Walt Disney made the conscious choice to change the story of the little mermaid so drastically that it completely and utterly replaced the original in a similar fashion to Puss in Boots. The blur of the line between fantasy and reality was established by none other than Disney himself. The reason why Disney was so successful was his revolutionary use of animation, sound, and when it made a rise, Technicolor.

From this point on, whenever someone reads a novel after seeing the movie, they envision the movie version of the character and not their own. Zipes channels emotion when he argues that because of Disney, we as a civilization, have lost contact with each other because of this drastic shift from oral storytelling to big screen storytelling.

Zipes says that we have lost a sense of community and lost the commonality, when in reality, there are a lot of people who can relate and find common interests thanks to Disney and his superpower of a franchise Zipes Zipes begins his argument by informing the audience that before Snow White, Mickey Mouse came along. At the same time Mickey Mouse was developed, this was around the same time that Disney decided to be his own boss and be in charge of his own productions.

His goal was engross the audience so closely that his films blurred the distinction between reality and fantasy. In order to wow and impress audiences, Disney decided to make history and begin the very first full-length animated film and so the concept of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs was contrived.

He pulled out all the stops and hired the best people in the business and the best inventions in the business as well. The final scenes of Snow White where the prince saves her is directly correlated to how Walt Disney swooped in and saved the world from the drab storytelling. However, similar to how the dwarves have the princess taken and then have to go back to work as if nothing happened, Zipes argues that the same thing happened to the workers Disney hired.

The dwarves do most of the hard work in the movie, caring for Snow White and still working. Jack Zipes employs ethos, pathos, and logos to further his argument and make people believe him and side with him. Walt Disney distorted the original story and folk tales and turned them into his own personal stories. The Disney animated films defeat the original purpose of the fairy tales and give the writers little to no acknowledgement.

Zipes uses examples from Puss in Boots as well as Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs to show just how much of a villain Walt Disney is when it comes to refuting the native purpose of storytelling. This essay has been submitted by a student.

This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. You can order our professional work here. Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. We will occasionally send you account related emails. Want us to write one just for you?

We use cookies to offer you the best experience. By continuing to use this website, you consent to our Cookies policy. Sorry, You cannot copy content from our website. By clicking "Send", you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement.

Would you like to have an original essay? We can write it better! Just try! Choose your writer among professionals! Order original essay. Essay due? We'll write it for you! Any subject Min. Disclaimer This essay has been submitted by a student. Download essay Need help with essay? Hire writer. Your essay sample has been sent. Order now. Words 2 Pages. Words 3 Pages. Words 4 Pages. Words 1 Pages. Do not miss your deadline waiting for inspiration!

Our writers will handle essay of any difficulty in no time. Want to get a custom essay from scratch?


Jack Zipes And His Connection To Walt Disney

To begin the article, Zipes first introduces the topic of fairy tales by incorporating a brief overview of the evolution and how the meanings changed over time. Before the tales were ever incorporated into films, Zipes argues that fairy tales were often used to relieve social conflict by describing past experiences to their audience. Whether it was to gain a sense of community in a tribe or to even display opposition against political figures, fairytales throughout history gave some sort of message to the intended audience and created a voice that was heard above all else when reading. To writers like Perrault and the Brothers Grimm, this message was the sole purpose of writing these tales. Zipes believes Disney manipulated his audience and caught their attention through elaborate images, bright colors, and loud sounds without incorporating the true message of the story. The films were simplistic and included reoccurring archetypal characters and predictable story lines, which also left the audience without opportunity for reflection or critical analysis.


Breaking The Disney Spell By Jack Zipes

These stories were adapted by the different storytellers to accommodate the interests of their audiences and societies. Folk tales altered as the beliefs and behaviors of the members of a particular group changed Zipes Generally, these tales were passed down by minorities: women, the poor, and other second class members of society. The plight of these.


Feminism & Fairy Tales

Very good article. I'm currently writing a research paper on fairytales and came across your blog. I'm using Jack Zipes for some of my sources. Mind sharing? I'm very interested :. I haven't seen Puss in Boots, so I can't comment to that specifically.

Related Articles