Sujit Das. This book dismantles Islam by exposing the imposture of Muhammad. The historical Muhammad is too privileged to be formally evaluated in the fashion a clinical psychologist would like. But given certain of his well-known and highly documented behaviors, it is certain that he had a conflict-ridden psychological dependence on others. He was not capable of introspection.
|Published (Last):||15 May 2009|
|PDF File Size:||11.2 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.7 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In the book Sujit has portrayed Muhammad as a narcissist. The book in question was thought provoking. Fasihuddin claimed that his initial email was replied by Sujit with four lettered word.
If so then this was very bad. However, the salient counter-observations of Fasihuddin in the said two posts are as follows:. Sujit and his writing are blasphemous, venomous, virulent, poisonous, out of context the true context was not explained , petty, convoluted, obnoxious, misleading, self-styled, cheap, with ulterior motive, perverted, uneducated, sinister, dirty, mean, dishonest, superficial, malicious, greedy, cursed, demonic, Bengali and Hindu propaganda etc.
Other references are there in favour of the prophet. Islam has humanizing and civilizational force even as per many of its Oriental critics. Sujit has not examined other historical figures like Confucius, Buddha and Christ etc.. Has Sujit examined his father in the same way?
Islam flourished in past years and is not defenseless. Ironically the prophet never imagined that his conducts, sayings and activities would be so critically examined by so many people even after years. I have found the situation Fasihuddin Vs Sujit interesting.
Thus I would like to comment on the main observations of Fasihuddin point by point and give a general observation about messengers and religions at the end. Hitting Sujit and his writing with all types of negative adjectives cannot elevate the position of the prophet. Sujit wrote what he thought to be correct. But the responses of Fasihuddin carry a sense of utter frustration and despair. Fasiuddin was angry. Humanizing force is found nowhere in Islam particularly in its plunders, violence, killing, slavery and sexual exploitation of Kafir women one-fifth of booty went to prophet.
Islamic civilization was to destroy existing civilizations after Jihadi conquests or conversion through Sufi saints Sufism was later addition in Islam and disowned by present day Islamists and imposing of Arabic civilization and culture. Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Pakistan, Bangladesh are some examples. Information available about the personal conducts of other great historical figures like Confucius, Buddha and Christ could not make them narcissists. However, Hitler was a confirmed narcissist.
In its early stage Islam developed a mechanism to ensure constant supply of innumerable number of self-righteous Islamic authorities petty narcissists across the length and breadth of Muslim populated areas of the world in the form of Ulema. They are the caretakers of Islam and control Muslim society with iron hands. Such teaching of Islam promotes animalist attitude and behavior in Muslims which is very attractive instinctively.
Islam allows its apostate to be killed by anybody even his son. Compulsory religious teaching during childhood permanently damages the brain of Muslim children and fills it with fictitious and ethnocentric glory of Islam.
Concept of paradise and hell is deeply impregnated in Muslim psyche. Blasphemy law is another means to infuse terror among Muslims though it is used mainly to persecute non-believers in Islamic countries. Preaching of hatred towards Kafir is a cementing force among Muslims. Belief of all non-believers as hell goers acts as a positive force in the minds of Muslims.
Large family size, as has been glorified in Islam, is another point of consideration. These are some of the reason as to why Islam has flourished during last years. Islam lacks in internal strength. These protecting factors are absent or insignificant in other major religions. If these are removed, Islam will crumble down within a decade. Islam does not count its apostates.
It is in a self denial state. If Fasihuddin does that then there is no Jahilia as taught in Islam. And in the process Fasihuddin will be culpable under blasphemy law of Pakistan. Some led a non-violent life and some a cruel restless one. Some propagated religion in a peaceful way while some propagated with sword, force and plunder. There is an obvious peculiarity about the time frame in which all nine major world religions came in to being. It spanned over a period of mere years between second millennium BC and seventh century AD whereas human history is more than years old.
After Islam, no new religion came up during next eight centuries. But these were off shoots from established religions with negligible number of followers in international context. This stoppage of the coming of new religion reflects that the need for religion s has ceased. Religions were said to guide people to make good human societies. But ironically religions have miserably failed to make this world peaceful. All major religions, except Islam, have lost preeminence among the followers in past century s.
Islam is in waiting. There is no escape. They are used to doing things they believe in, without question. Therefore, it is hard for them to put forward a logical defense when someone raises logical questions about their faith. Such inability drives them crazy, when people challenge their faith. Islam truly represents the spirit of surrender to God. Such philosophy made its captive followers incapable of facing criticism. So, they needed safeguards to protect Islam. But, safeguard can protect only in a controlled environment.
World is open now, and so is Islam. World pays much more attention to Islam now. People know so much about Islam and its messengers, which, I believe, will make Islam at par with any other contemporary religions.
Call Us Today! However, the salient counter-observations of Fasihuddin in the said two posts are as follows: 1. One Comment. Jiten Roy May 19, at pm.
Leave A Comment.
Islam Dismantled: The Mental Illness of Prophet Muhammad
ISLAM DISMANTLED & DISMANTLING SUJIT DAS
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing — Edmund Burke. In this article, I intend to introduce the book to you and to discuss few salient features of the book. In the market there is no shortage of books critical to Islam, but why should the readers purchase this particular book? What is there in this book that makes this book unique? As the author of this book I am answerable to each one of you. This book dismantles Islam by exposing the imposture of Muhammad. The historical Muhammad is too privileged to be formally evaluated in the fashion a clinical psychologist would like.
Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed. Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam. Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since This is a psycho-biography of mad Muhammad.
Islam Dismantled : The Mental Illness of Prophet Muhammad
In the book Sujit has portrayed Muhammad as a narcissist. The book in question was thought provoking. Fasihuddin claimed that his initial email was replied by Sujit with four lettered word. If so then this was very bad. However, the salient counter-observations of Fasihuddin in the said two posts are as follows:.