Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book.

Author:Vugami Voodooktilar
Language:English (Spanish)
Published (Last):1 January 2019
PDF File Size:1.42 Mb
ePub File Size:18.78 Mb
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

To browse Academia. Skip to main content. By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies. To learn more, view our Privacy Policy. Log In Sign Up. Papers People. Save to Library. Ibnu Khaldun dan Historiografi Islam. Kesesatan Syiah Menurut Ibn Khaldun. Kepakaran Ibnu Khaldun dari berbagai disiplin ilmu, terutama sosiologis sudah diakui oleh jumhur ulama dan ilmuan, karena itulah dia mendapat gelar "Bapak Sosiologi".

Kali ini saya tidak mengangkat masalah sosiologis dalam kitab Kali ini saya tidak mengangkat masalah sosiologis dalam kitab Al-Muqaddimah, melainkan pemaparan dan pandangannya terhadap aliran sesat Syiah.

Sufi Articulations of Civility, Globality, and Sovereignty. Cite as: Salvatore, Armando. This article provides an analysis of Sufi life and organization, combining This article provides an analysis of Sufi life and organization, combining historical depth and theoretical awareness. It investigates how Sufism emerged as an urban phenomenon.

Sufi brotherhoods were at the forefront of a proto-globalization based on a hemisphere-wide networking between metropolitan regions, rural provinces, and nomadic formations. Furthermore, cities became nodes within wider circulations, rather than, as in European and Weberian models, centers of corporate powers. The emerging patterns of civility were open-ended, balancing inner cultivation, communicative skills, and outward etiquette. The article shows how this global civility translated into original conceptions of sovereignty that were more malleable than those of the European Leviathan.

A millenarian universalism imbued with Sufi saintliness bolstered the centralized sovereignty of early modern Muslim empires. Sufi contributions to these empires nurtured a cosmopolitan culture, facilitating commercial exchange and intellectual connectedness between Europe and China. When Europe rose to global hegemony, neo-Sufi movements engaged in state-building processes which challenged European colonial presence. The article concludes by exploring how post-Sufi developments within Muslim-majority postcolonial societies re-oriented state power and led to the emergence of a trans-territorial notion of sovereignty.

Executioners were common social figures in societies of institutionalized power structures. It was a common practice that many of them were recruited from among the members of social groups which were discussed by Simmel and Weber in the context of the stranger and pariah concepts respectively in both centralized tribal communities and more complex state structures. Filsafat Pendidikan Islam Kel 5. Ibn Khaldun, is one of the medieval geographer who serves as a bridge between antiquity and the modern era, was born in Tunis in The great thinker has made many important task through his life such as; vizier, clerk, sheikh and The great thinker has made many important task through his life such as; vizier, clerk, sheikh and judge.

He spent most of his life in Maghreb, Andalusia, Egypt and during this period, he travelled a large part of North Africa. In , he died in Cairo where he spent the last twenty-four years of his life. Like many Medieval scholars, Ibn Khaldun has interested in different sciences and he has revealed various opinions in such as; geography, history, economics, philosophy, sociology, literature and politics.

In the thesis, the human geography views of Ibn Khaldun have been discussed. The subjects in Muqaddimah such as seven climate regions, geographical determinism, settlement geography, political geography and economic geography are taken by geographical perspective and they have been compared with modern geography.

Ibn Khaldun's geographical ideas have been tried to compare with the views in modern geography that emerged hundreds of years after him. Evaluation of dominant paradigm forseeing disciplinary distinction in social sciences over Muqaddimah of Ibn Khaldun. Introduction The human race has come to strive to solve the problems caused by nature and understanding as well as interpreting the world he lives in as per nature.

However, scientific studies undertaken in civilizations in the pre-modern era have had the propensity to perceive matters holistically with respect to the grasp of reality.

Scientists, who had un-dertaken activities in the traditional era however, had undertaken studies in different areas which cannot even be considered to stand side by side today. Science has also displayed an intertwined outlook with artistic activities for many years.

In this sense; the scientific activities undertaken in the said historical phase being mentioned in order to exceed the paradigm being dominant nowadays must definitely be taken into consideration.

The main problematic of works have also been based on this viewpoint. The analysis of classical texts written before the modern era offers wide opportunities to those social scientists, who look through disciplinary lenses as a result of the presently dominant paradigm, for taking these lenses off.

In fact, as mentioned such works have taken social matters together with their multiple aspects at the point of perceiving social reality as opposed to present disciplinary distinctions. In this respect, Ibn Khaldun's epistemological and methodological heritage has a great significance at the point of solving the problems social sciences have experiences nowadays as a modern notion. Before taking up the importance of Ibn Khaldun's methodology, it will be significant to question the notion of social science, legitimacy of sub-disciplines shaped as a result of such social sciences.

In fact, it is necessary to take up the discussions concerning the historical build-up of social sciences, development and discussions in social sciences held nowadays must be taken up within the entirety of historical beauty.

This situation is remembering that the present discussions are not a natural reflection of problems merely being experienced presently, yet that they have also arisen out of the establishment thereof Hira, At this point, within the scope of study foremost two basic paradigmatic breaks will be focused on, such breaks having occurred within the historical process.

My main argument in this paper is that western hegemony, colonization, imperial and neocolonial domination over the Third World has been sustained My main argument in this paper is that western hegemony, colonization, imperial and neocolonial domination over the Third World has been sustained through knowledge production that has become hegemonic on a global scale since the rise of western modernity.

Furthermore, I argue that settler colonialism in Palestine took place and has been maintained through that structure. Formal independence of previously colonized countries has not led to real decolonization, not only because these countries continued to be economically and otherwise dependent on Western powers, but also importantly if not more so, due to dependency on knowledge produced in western academic institutions.

For Palestine to be truly free from dependency in the future, academic institutions must rethink their goals from being neoliberal money making institutions to ones that aim at creating educated and free thinking subjects, rethink disciplines that are offered to students rather than blindly copy disciplines and their contents from western academic institutions, engage with decolonial thought that is produced. Prologue to, "Religious Philosophy essays" "This hopeful, nay, expectant way of pursuing understanding puts the author among the most eminent historians of philosophy, both for his thoroughly humanistic spirit and rich store of insight A main thrust of the book, I take it, is to show that during the sixteen centuries from Philo to Spinoza, philosophy had a richer subject matter than it has had since Spinoza.

It induces reflection on the present condition of philosophy. The subjects range from Plato to the European 18th century. Wolfson presents himself as only a historian, not prepared to philosophize or theologise, but he cannot be taken quite at his word.

This dragon man is no ordinary guide. His effort is endless. Harvard U. Press, Wolfson's massive studies--the two-volume sets on Philo and Spinoza, for instance, or the first part of The Philosophy of the Church Fathers--these ten essays offer a series of brief but enlightening introductory paddles. The eleventh piece, a concluding Sermonette, is neither enlightening nor a happy introduction to a rigorous mind.

To accept this theme is, in effect, to look at the history of Western religious philosophy from New Testament times to Spinoza's in a very special way.

Picking up three histories of philosophy at random, I find that Bertrand Russell's History of Western Philosophy mentions the Jewish philosopher Philo of Alexandria 20? Fuller's History of Philosophy devotes about three and a half pages to Philo but concludes that "Philo seems to have had no disciples of note and no direct influence, at any rate, upon the century and a half that intervenes between his death and the birth of Plotinus" p.

Jones in his History of Western Philosophy Vol. I rates Philo's worth at just over a page and a caustic footnote. If, however, we look at religious philosophy in Wolfson's way, we see Philo as the root and determining origin of all medieval philosophizing, Jewish, Christian and Muslim ; We further see the medieval philosophy begun by Philo as a homogeneous system of thought, lying between pagan Greek speculations and the secular systems of the seventeenth century. But actually he is more than that.

He is the interpreter of Greek philosophy in terms of certain fundamental teachings of his Hebrew Scripture , whereby he revolutionized philosophy and remade it into what became the common philosophy of the three religions with cognate Scriptures, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam p.

In all the essays the topics are taken partly as Philonic in origin; it is Wolfson's aim to make the quarrels of medieval and later thinkers more intelligible in the light of their positions' intellectual ancestry. Religious Philosophy This 'group of essays' was originally published by Harvard University Press, in a chapter for lecture presentation of the wide scope essays.

It represent a full-fledged monographs of high quality and full spectrum religious philosophic issues, selected from various lectures delivered by him at Dumbarton Oakes Symposia, Harvard, and Emory, Fordham Universities, N.

Reading this variety of thought engaging philosophical and theological essays, that has spanned fifteen years , provides the reader with a taste of Wolfson's 'Philosophic Garden,' of his above mentioned works. This fine tome in its own right would be a scholar's pride, with a major contribution to its field, Wolfson makes clear the Jewish role in the development of Islamic philosophy and Western thought.

They studied them, they examined them, they scrutinized them, and finally arrived at the conclusion that, while some of them were the paltry result of the blind groping of human reason for a truth which can be known only by faith and revelation, most of them were only polite but empty phrases for the honest atheism of the fool of Scripture. Wolfson: a great humanist, a prolific and creative scholar in the history of philosophy, was the first Professor of Hebrew Literature and Philosophy in Harvard, America, and may be worldwide.

As a scholar of comparative Jewish studies, he was acclaimed and admired throughout the world. His inspiring books and essays earned him honor and respect. His systematic study of Jewish thinkers from Philo of Alexandria to Benedict Spinoza, and his integration in a vivid comparative study of Jewish, Christian, and Islamic thought into a harmonious philosophy, attracted a wide international readership.

Mainstream sociology of religion often presumes that its conceptual cate-gories are universal and complete. This article outlines an alternative Related Topics. Ibnul Qayyim. Follow Following. Sejarah Pemikiran Ekonomi Ibnu Taimiyyah. Al Maqrizi Dan Shah Waliyullah.

Doctoral education. Visual Comunication. Ibn Khaldun. Sejarah Pemikiran Ekonomi Islam. Philosophical Scepticism. Ads help cover our server costs. Remember me on this computer.


Filsafat Sejarah Ibn Khaldun

Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer. Abstract This paper aims to compare the two great minds of Ibn Khaldun and Karl Marx in terms of their similaritiesand differences. According to Karl Marx, the development of modes of production from time to time is a necessity. Whereas, Ibn Khaldun in his book of Al-Muqaddimah argues thatthe fall of empire sovereignty is rooted in the nature of its power. This research applied descriptive comparative and qualitative approach. The study concludes that there are some similarities between Ibn Khaldun and Karl Marxalthoughthere are more distinct differences.


IBN KHALDUN THOUGHT: A review of al-Muqaddimah Book



Ibnu Khaldun



A Comparative Study: The Economic Thoughts of Ibn Khaldun and Karl Marx


Related Articles